In brief
P. A. Yeomans' order for planning land: from what is hardest to change, climate and land shape, through water, roads, trees, buildings and fences to soil.
What the scale is for
Every piece of land has things that will outlast any plan and things that can be changed next week. The scale of permanence puts them in order. P. A. Yeomans, the Australian farmer and engineer behind Keyline design, worked it out on his farms Yobarnie and Nevallan and set it out in The Challenge of Landscape (1958). His list runs from the most lasting to the most changeable:
- Climate: rain, temperature, wind, the length of the dry season.
- Land shape: slopes, ridges, valleys, the form of the ground.
- Water supply: where water falls, runs, can be held and stored.
- Roads and access: tracks and paths, how people, machines and animals move.
- Trees: woodland, shelterbelts, orchards.
- Buildings: houses, sheds, stables.
- Subdivision fences: the division of land into paddocks and fields.
- Soil: its life, its structure, its organic matter.
The further down the list, the less energy it takes to change an element, and the more freely it can be fitted to what lies above. Yeomans drew a planning rule from this: decide in this order, and the farm grows with its landscape instead of against it. A track laid before the water lines are known may later carry runoff like a gutter. A fence drawn on a straight survey line cuts across the natural flow of the slope. A house built in the wrong place fixes the paths of a whole life.
Soil standing last is the surprising part. For Yeomans it was not a given but something good management could build within a few years, once water, access and trees sit in the right places. Permaculture took the scale up early. David Holmgren used Keyline extensively in his designs, and the scale fits his principle design from patterns to details.
How to use it, step by step
Take a notebook, a map or aerial photo of the land, and walk down the list. At each level ask three questions: what is there, what can be changed, and what follows for the levels below?
- Climate. Collect what is known: rainfall over the year, the dry months, the wind directions, frost or its absence. Then look for the small climates of the site, which can differ markedly from the regional figures; the page on microclimate shows how.
- Land shape. Sketch ridges, valleys and the main slopes. A contour map, a laser level, a water level or a simple A-frame shows where the ground is steep and where it flattens. This is the work of the base map.
- Water. Walk the land in heavy rain. Where does water run, where does it gather, where does it vanish? Mark the places where it could be slowed, spread and sunk, for instance with a swale or a pond.
- Access. Lay tracks and paths so that they serve the water rather than fight it: along ridges, where little water gathers, or on gentle grades that lead runoff to where it is wanted.
- Trees. Place shelterbelts, woodland and orchards where they protect, hold slopes and use the water that the levels above have provided.
- Buildings. Set them where sun, wind, water and paths are already understood.
- Fences. Draw subdivisions that follow the landscape, not the survey grid.
- Soil. Build it up where the framework above makes this possible, with cover, mulch, compost and careful grazing.
The scale is an order of decisions, not a timetable. Covering bare soil with mulch is cheap, reversible and useful from the first day. What the scale warns against is an expensive, lasting decision taken before the levels above it are understood.
Later versions
The scale has been widened several times. Dave Jacke and Eric Toensmeier, in Edible Forest Gardens (2005), extended it to eleven items: climate, landform, water, invisible structures such as social and economic factors, access and circulation, vegetation and wildlife, microclimate, buildings and infrastructure, zones of use, soil, and aesthetics and experience. The Australian designer Darren Doherty built his Regrarians Platform on Yeomans' scale and added layers such as economy and energy. Andrew Millison's open textbook at Oregon State University teaches it under the name Keyline Scales of Permanence. Whatever the version, the core is the same: what lasts longest and costs most to change is decided first.
Common mistakes
- Starting with the plants. The plant list is often the first thing people write. On the scale it comes late, after water and access, which decide where plants can thrive at all.
- Roads before water. A track cut across the slope before the flows are known becomes a channel in the first heavy storm.
- Treating soil as fixed. Poor soil is often taken as a final verdict. Yeomans showed that soil changes faster than almost anything else on the list.
- Reading the scale as dogma. It ranks decisions by permanence. It does not forbid small, early steps on the lower levels.
Further in the TerraWiki
- P. A. Yeomans and Keyline design: the origin of the scale and the water system built on it.
- The design process: where the scale sits in the sequence of a permaculture design.
- Swale, retention pond and water retention landscape: techniques for the water level of the scale.
- Zones and sectors: tools for placing elements once the frame stands.
- Spade test and soil analysis: ways into the last level, the soil.
The scale at Sa Medada
Read from the top, the scale describes Sa Medada like this. The climate: a frost-free slope in Jerzu, in Ogliastra on the east side of Sardinia, with mild winters and a dry season from roughly May to September. The land shape and the water: a LiDAR wetness map shows a comparatively dry main area and moister channels along the edges. Swales are planned; none has been built yet. The trees: an old olive grove, and macchia on the steeper slopes. The soil: a laboratory analysis does not yet exist, so no statement is made about its humus or nutrients.
Project Eden begins with pioneer plants, ground cover and holding water.
Frequently asked
What is the scale of permanence?
The scale of permanence is a planning order developed by the Australian farmer and engineer P. A. Yeomans as part of Keyline design. It lists the elements of a farm from the most lasting to the most changeable: climate, land shape, water supply, roads and access, trees, buildings, subdivision fences and soil. The further down the list, the less energy an element takes to change. Planning in this order means the changeable things are fitted to the permanent ones, rather than the farm being built against its own landscape.
Why is soil last on the scale of permanence?
Because for Yeomans soil was not a fixed given but something that good management can change within a few years. Parent rock and texture stay as they are, but the living topsoil, its organic matter and structure, can improve or decline within a few seasons, depending on grazing, cover, cultivation and water. Climate cannot be changed, and moving land shape costs enormous effort. Putting soil last does not mean it matters least. It means that soil can be built once water, access and trees are in the right places.
Where does the scale of permanence come from?
P. A. Yeomans worked out the scale on his own farms Yobarnie and Nevallan near North Richmond in New South Wales, through years of trial in a dry landscape with irregular rain. He set it out in The Challenge of Landscape (1958), one of his books on Keyline. Permaculture took it up early: David Holmgren used Keyline extensively in his designs, and the scale became part of permaculture teaching worldwide. Andrew Millison's open textbook at Oregon State University presents it as the Keyline Scales of Permanence.
Are there newer versions of the scale of permanence?
Yes. Dave Jacke and Eric Toensmeier, in Edible Forest Gardens (2005), extended the list to eleven items, adding invisible structures such as social and economic factors, vegetation and wildlife, microclimate, zones of use and aesthetics. The Australian designer Darren Doherty built his Regrarians Platform on Yeomans' scale and added layers such as economy and energy. The versions differ in detail, but they keep the core idea: decide first what lasts longest and costs most to change.
How does the scale of permanence apply at Sa Medada?
At the top of the scale stands the climate: Sa Medada is a frost-free slope in Jerzu with mild winters and a dry season from about May to September. Next comes land shape, and with it water: a LiDAR wetness map shows a comparatively dry main area and moister channels along the edges. Swales are planned; none has been built yet. Among the trees are old olives, with macchia on the steeper slopes. A laboratory analysis of the soil does not yet exist.

Related terms






Mentioned in
See this in practice
Further reading from around the world
Freely available sources we recommend for going deeper.
- CourseScales of Permanence, from Introduction to Permaculture (Andrew Millison, Oregon State University)eng.libretexts.org
- WebsiteUsing the Scale of Permanence as a Tool for Land Evaluation (Cornell Small Farms Program)smallfarms.cornell.edu
- WebsiteKeyline design, with the Keyline Scale of Permanence (Wikipedia)en.wikipedia.org
- WebsitePrinciple 7: Design from patterns to details (Holmgren Design)permacultureprinciples.com
Sources
- P. A. Yeomans, The Challenge of Landscape: The Development and Practice of Keyline, Keyline Publishing, Sydney (1958)
- Andrew Millison, Introduction to Permaculture, chapter Scales of Permanence, Oregon State University Open Educational Resources (CC BY-NC 4.0), via LibreTexts (accessed October 2026)
- Steve Gabriel, Using the Scale of Permanence as a Tool for Land Evaluation, Cornell Small Farms Program (2016, accessed October 2026)
- Dave Jacke and Eric Toensmeier, Edible Forest Gardens, Volume 2: Ecological Design and Practice for Temperate-Climate Permaculture, Chelsea Green (2005)
- David Holmgren, Permaculture: Principles and Pathways Beyond Sustainability, Holmgren Design Services (2002, revised edition Melliodora Publishing 2017)
Last updated: 2026-10-16